Human Intelligence is a bit harder to define, since we are in the middle of the experience. I would agree with the Psychology Today description below. That being said, the awareness of self is really what separates us from the animals. My question: do we have to be aware that we exist to be intelligent as a human? If AI uses in its definition human intelligence, then AI's ability to regurgitate an IQ test will be an accurate measurement.  As with Deep Blue, the ability to know all the moves on the chess board is quite different from being able to play a game with a grand master.   

 The mental capacity to learn from experiences, adapt to new situations, understand and handle abstract concepts, and use knowledge to manipulate one’s environment. Including skills such as problem solving, critical thinking, learning quickly, and understanding complex ideas seem out of scope to the IQ test assessment.

Most theories of how human cognition is unique propose specific representational capacities or biases, often thought to arise through evolutionary change. In this Perspective, we argue that the evidence that supports these domain-specific theories is confounded by general information-processing differences. We argue that human uniqueness arises through genetic quantitative increases in the global capacity to process information and share it among systems such as memory, attention and learning. This change explains regularities across numerous subdomains of cognition, behavioural comparisons between species and phenomena in child development. This strict evolutionary continuity theory of human intelligence is consistent with comparative evidence about neural evolution and computational constraints of memory on the ability to represent rules, patterns and abstract generalizations. We show how these differences in the degree of information processing capacity yield differences in kind for human cognition relative to other animals.

April 18, 2024

Rethinking What Makes Human Intelligence Unique

A new study finds the ability to process vast amounts of information sets humans apart from other animals

Media Inquiries

A research collaboration between Steven Piantadosi of UC Berkeley and Jessica Cantlon of Carnegie Mellon University contributes to a rethinking of what makes human intelligence unique. 

In a paper published on April 2 in Nature Reviews Psychology, they argue that the distinguishing feature of human intelligence is our ability to process and share vast amounts of information. This work argues against prevailing “silver bullet” theories, which had previously maintained that a single cognitive feature — such as social reasoning or tool use — led to our distinctive intelligence.

"Over the years, there’s been quite a few theories of what makes human intelligence unique and distinctive, especially compared with other animals,” said Piantadosi. “These silver bullet theories argue that one cognitive change makes human intelligence different from other species.”

The study, “Uniquely human intelligence arose from expanded information capacity,” showed that unlike monkeys and other animals, humans can handle large amounts of information across many different areas, spanning as language or symbolic thinking, problem-solving and understanding social situations.

“People have underestimated the power of incremental quantitative change in cognition to yield big leaps in intelligence,” said Jessica Cantlon, the Ronald J. and Mary Ann Zdrojkowski Associate Professor of Developmental Neuroscience and Psychology at CMU. “Our new paper brings together evidence and theories from animals, child development, neuroscience and machine learning to argue that small incremental changes in processing power are sufficient for explaining the major advances in human intelligence over evolution." 

Instead of focusing on one unique human ability, the study examined prior literature on simple tasks and found that people did better in virtually all of them. For example, humans can use and understand a wide range of symbols and tools, while animals might only grasp a few. Children can learn to recognize and remember images much faster than primates. The same goes for solving analogies or tracking social relationships. 

"Our proposal is not that there's one little piece that has changed in human intelligence, but that there's an overall general capacity difference,” Piantadosi said. “People can handle complex systems and symbols like we see in language or mathematics, but other species can only handle a few, at best.” 

These results engage a debate that has simmered since Darwin about whether the differences between humans and other species are small and incremental, or fundamentally big jumps. The paper includes mathematical results showing that small differences in memory capacity can lead to large differences in terms of ability. The findings tie into human evolution by suggesting that as human brains grew larger over time, they got better at handling many tasks. This idea also connects with artificial intelligence (AI), where scaling larger and more complex learning systems often seems to improve performance dramatically. 

“We think Darwin was right — psychological differences between us and other primates are a matter of degree,” Cantlon said. “The twist is that, in terms of cognition, those differences in degree lead to differences in the kind.”

The finding that our intelligence relies on general capacity rather than one or two special innate skills can help bolster research and development in both psychology and AI, shedding light on how to create machines that think more like humans.